On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 06:59:45AM -0400, Brian Haberman wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> On Apr 4, 2005, at 22:12, Joe Abley wrote:
>
> >
> >On 4 Apr 2005, at 08:35, Pekka Savola wrote:
> >
> >>This is a timely topic, because IPv6 WG just less than week ago
> >>forwarded the revision of the addressing arc
Perry Lorier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bill Fenner wrote:
> > I usually think of the small home router configuration problem -
> > buy a box, plug it in, it wants you to configure it using a web
> > page, and it's probably fe80::1. I don't have any systems in my
> > house that have fewer than
JINMEI Tatuya / =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCP0BMQEMjOkgbKEI=?=
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 06:13:22 -0700,
> > Kristine Adamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > Thanks for the responses. But if RFC3542 is not updated, won't this
> > adversely affect the portability
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the IP Version 6 Working Group Working Group of
the IETF.
Title : Privacy Extensions for Stateless Address
Autoconfiguration in IPv6
Author(s) : T. Narten,
Hi Joe,
On Apr 4, 2005, at 22:12, Joe Abley wrote:
On 4 Apr 2005, at 08:35, Pekka Savola wrote:
This is a timely topic, because IPv6 WG just less than week ago
forwarded the revision of the addressing architecture to be published
as Draft Standard. (IPv6 WG is Cc:ed.)
That draft,
http://www.
