[Dropping HIP WG from CC; still including IPv6 though...]
My understanding is that these are not routable addresses. That
is, they won't appear in routing protocol exchanges or routing
tables. If that is the case, then we are talking about the
allocation of something different than IPv6
In your previous mail you wrote:
My understanding is that these are not routable addresses. That is,
they won't appear in routing protocol exchanges or routing tables.
If that is the case, then we are talking about the allocation of
something different than IPv6 addresses.
=> yo
My understanding is that these are not routable addresses. That is,
they won't appear in routing protocol exchanges or routing tables.
If that is the case, then we are talking about the allocation of
something
different than IPv6 addresses.
Regards,
Brian
On Nov 10, 2005, at 11:42, Bob Hinden
Pekka,
On Nov 9, 2005, at 10:49 AM, ext Pekka Nikander wrote:
The basic question is whether we should go forward with it, and if
so, where?
Could we last call it at the Internet Area, as the IPv6 chairs
indicate that they consider it a larger issue and not just IPv6
specific?
While I do
