Hi,
thank you for your reply.
Stig Venaas wrote:
Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
Hello,
Le Lundi 29 Mai 2006 13:23, Arifumi Matsumoto a écrit :
- Teredo is defined. (RFC4380)
Teredo should have less priority than 6to4 and IPv4
considering its communication overhead and reliability ?
Le Mardi 30 Mai 2006 09:42, Arifumi Matsumoto a écrit :
About SIP and P2P applications,
especially nowadays, they are already NAT-aware.
They might be in a few years. They are definitely not yet, but OK, the
updated spec is not there yet either.
So, even when you use a private IPv4 address
Hi all,
I was reading through RFC 4113 and one thing that is not clear to me is
the expected behavior of udpEndpointInstance. In particular, is the
instance persistent (i.e. does an endpoint have to be associated with a
particular instance throughout its lifetime)? Any insight would be
