Selon Manfredi, Albert E [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm not sure what different the intermediate routers would have to do,
if anything.
Nothing. But policy boxes and firewalls would be slower because of the IHL
difference.
It's a way of tackling the
address space problem without depending on a new
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 01:10:12PM -0400, Manfredi, Albert E wrote:
Not sure if this is the right wg for this idea, or for that matter if
I'm suggesting anything new.
[...]
Wouldn't it be nice if we could have NAPT without the TCP/UDP Port ID
trick?
You're reinventing source routing.
[...]
To
So we can see that as a migration technique too: when you have a
plurality of IPv4 networks that you do not want to migrate immediately,
this might actually provide a way to migrate at your own rhythm. As you
point out it is easy to define the double-mapped format using a mix of
mapped address and
Hi,
While this is an interesting topic, it's not appropriate for the the
IPv6 mailing list.
There is lots of prior work on schemes to expand the IPv4 address
space using various forms of source routing and/or encapsulation.
Even one written by me, namely RFC1955. The community decided
(posted with permission of the IPv6 WG co-chairs)
If you have any free IPv6 connectivity service or other publicly available
services, see below and register them at the IPv6 Day website
(http://www.ipv6day.org).
Contributors to translate the main web site pages to other languages are
welcome
