Re: Proposal to change aspects of Neighbor Discovery

2006-09-01 Thread Pars Mutaf
Hello, In addition to the previous remarks: Imagine that you have a friend who calls you to check if you are still reachable, say every 15 minutes. And imagine that you don't need to answer! The periodic RAs are that friend. This is frankly excellent. They periodically simulate an incomin

RE: Proposal to change aspects of Neighbor Discovery

2006-09-01 Thread Soliman, Hesham
> > 3) The current ND specs have an upper limit of 30 minutes on the > > interval between router advertisements. That should be > changed, to > > allow deployments to use a higher value. (that is the > > assertion/problem.) > > > > This is certainly possible and one could do it,

Re: [netlmm] Multilink Subnet Considerations for NETLMM Addressing

2006-09-01 Thread Julien Laganier
On Thursday 31 August 2006 19:55, James Kempf wrote: > Maybe I'm confused, but I don't see what L=0 really means. If > ADDRCONF assigns the prefix to the interface, then the prefix is on > link for at least one node, the node that configured the interface > with the prefix. I suppose one could argu