Pars Mutaf wrote:
Hello,
I have updated my HUMID internet draft entitled:
"Human-regenerable IPv6 interface identifiers and addresses"
Until it appears at the IETF site, you can find it at the
following address if you're interested:
http://www.freewebs.com/pmutaf/draft-mutaf-ipv6humid-01.txt
Templin, Fred L wrote:
Elwyn,
Maybe somebody ought to write a very short I-D just to set the record
straight.
It looks like there was at least one attempt to do that; see:
http://mirrors.isc.org/pub/www.watersprings.org/pub/id/draft-newman-netw
ork-byte-order-01.txt
I think Chr
Hello,
I have updated my HUMID internet draft entitled:
"Human-regenerable IPv6 interface identifiers and addresses"
Until it appears at the IETF site, you can find it at the
following address if you're interested:
http://www.freewebs.com/pmutaf/draft-mutaf-ipv6humid-01.txt
I would very much
Hello,
The issue was raised again in 16ng, so I'm trying to help
moving forward on this issue. (I dropped out my dormant mode
reliability concerns for future work, but I hope this has
complemented the discussion.)
I have a couple of comments on the signaling analysis made
by Erik and James:
IMH
Templin, Fred L wrote:
[..]
Do we need a more detailed and unified "IETF Reference
Architecture" document, or are existing documents like
RFC1958 enough?
This more looks like a call for an "IETF Encyclopedia" or a FAQ... which
thus nowadays would mean a Wiki ;) Especially with many terms consi
Elwyn,
> Maybe somebody ought to write a very short I-D just to set the record
> straight.
It looks like there was at least one attempt to do that; see:
http://mirrors.isc.org/pub/www.watersprings.org/pub/id/draft-newman-netw
ork-byte-order-01.txt
I don't know the status of this effort, and I
