Hi Albert,
El 12/11/2007, a las 19:28, Manfredi, Albert E escribió:
I found nothing objectionable at all in the draft.
Matter of fact, it seems to address something that also occurs with
IPv4, with multihomed hosts. And that apparently, some OSs screw up
royally. Which is, if a multi-homed
Manfredi, Albert E writes:
Matter of fact, it seems to address something that also occurs with
IPv4, with multihomed hosts. And that apparently, some OSs screw up
royally. Which is, if a multi-homed IPv4 host, connected to two
different IP subnets, transmits an IP packet over Subnet A, it
-Original Message-
From: James Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't agree that those OSes screw up royally. They are, in fact,
doing what their users *tell* them to do.
If an application binds the source address on Subnet B and then sends
a packet with a destination address
Manfredi, Albert E writes:
-Original Message-
From: James Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't agree that those OSes screw up royally. They are, in fact,
doing what their users *tell* them to do.
If an application binds the source address on Subnet B and then sends
Margaret- Thank you for taking time on this. Not to be pushy, but when do you
plan to have your revision out?
Thank you
Marla
-Original Message-
From: Margaret Wasserman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 5:36 PM
To: Per Heldal
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: New
