RE: [dhcwg] Brokenness of specs w.r.t. client behavior with MO bits

2008-10-18 Thread TJ
an equivalent approach is to extend RS/RA ... Just FWIW - IMHO that would be better than the deprecation of RAs. (Although I personally am OK with both RAs and DHCPv6 ... I think we just could use a cleaner definition of the M O bits and how the hosts act on them) /TJ -Original

HITBSecConf2008 - Malaysia: Online registration closes on 24th Oct

2008-10-18 Thread Praburaajan
This is a reminder that online registration for HITBSecConf2008 - Malaysia, the largest network security conference in Asia and the Middle East, closes on the 24th of October - walk in registrations are still accepted thereafter but prices increase to MYR1099. To book your seats online, please

RE: [dhcwg] Brokenness of specs w.r.t. client behavior with MO bits

2008-10-18 Thread Kadirvel Chockalingam Vanniarajan
Based on the discussion I have seen so far, having support for both is ok for desktop kind of machines which hardly move out of premise but with the advent of nomadic devices, I feel this is going to make it difficult for the clients to make the right choice safely. 1) What could be the