On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:08:18 +0100
Alexandru Petrescu alexandru.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
Mark Smith a écrit :
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:16:33 +0100 Alexandru Petrescu
alexandru.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
Mark Smith a écrit :
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:03:54 +0100 Alexandru Petrescu
Hello,
This small document puts to text a common problem with RFC3484 that was
brought up several times at the mike and on Jabber.
Comments welcome. Maybe this should be quickly discussed at the next meeting??
(Yes - I do know there is a rewrite of RFC3484 in the work)
On Wednesday
At Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:15:48 +0100,
Alexandru Petrescu alexandru.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
Following up my own post, detailing what I meant, and limiting my email
sending rate right after :-)
Saving wireless bandwidth: allow to send only one PIO in the RA instead
of two. This may be useful
JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 a écrit :
At Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:15:48 +0100, Alexandru Petrescu
alexandru.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
Following up my own post, detailing what I meant, and limiting my
email sending rate right after :-)
Saving wireless bandwidth: allow to send only one PIO in the RA
Mark Smith a écrit :
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:08:18 +0100 Alexandru Petrescu
alexandru.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
Mark Smith a écrit :
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:16:33 +0100 Alexandru Petrescu
alexandru.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
Mark Smith a écrit :
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:03:54 +0100 Alexandru
