Hi Suresh,
Sounds good to me.
Thanks,
Vishwas
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Suresh Krishnan
wrote:
> Hi Vishwas,
> Thanks for your comments. Please find responses inline.
>
> On 26/05/09 12:09 PM, Vishwas Manral wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The document version now is 02 and not 01. I support the
Hi Christian,
On 26/05/09 01:40 PM, Christian Vogt wrote:
Yes, the document should contain more explicit guidance for firewall
builders on how the document affects their products. Given the apparent
absence of overlapping fragment for legitimate traffic, it would be
safe, and even recommended,
Hi Vishwas,
Thanks for your comments. Please find responses inline.
On 26/05/09 12:09 PM, Vishwas Manral wrote:
Hi,
The document version now is 02 and not 01. I support the document.
That said I think the below could be clarified further about what
needs to be done to the current fragment (i
