Erik Nordmark wrote:
>I suspect that you also can't use DHCPv6 for non-addresses (finding the
>DNS servers etc) since DHCPv6 might assume that some communication uses
>the link-local address. But I haven't checked in the RFC.
Snipped from RFC 3315, section 1.1 is:
[Clients and servers exchange
In your previous mail you wrote:
For a end-device (a host), if the interface connecting to IPv6 network is
configured with IPv6 global address, then automatic configuration of
link-local address is mandatory for that interface? Consider the host is
being statically configured with IP
Possibly recalling incorrectly here, but I believe Vista can function sans
Link Local addressing.
(IIRC - It tries, but doesn't care too much if it fails (due to DAD
collision, for example) ...)
/TJ
>-Original Message-
>From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Beh
Prabhu Hariharan wrote:
Hi,
For a end-device (a host), if the interface connecting to IPv6 network
is configured with IPv6 global address, then automatic configuration of
link-local address is mandatory for that interface? Consider the host
is being statically configured with IPv6 default ga
Jari,
As an individual contributor, I am happy with the rules specified
in this draft and support adoption by the working group. I was also
unable to find any other RFC or draft that specified the IANA rules for
the routing header Type field.
Regards,
Brian
Jari Arkko wrote:
I spoke ab
Hi,
For a end-device (a host), if the interface connecting to IPv6 network is
configured with IPv6 global address, then automatic configuration of
link-local address is mandatory for that interface? Consider the host is
being statically configured with IPv6 default gateway address.
Without the p
