Yes. Cable access concentrators (also called a CMTS (Cable Modem
Termination System)) for ipv4 support an ARP Proxy. So it was natural
when the CMTS moved to also supporting IPv6, having the CMTS support ND
Proxy was a natural transition. Two different CMTS vendors (one is
Cisco) support ND
Hi Rémi,
Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
Le mercredi 4 novembre 2009 18:40:26 Alan Davy, vous avez écrit :
We are currently specifying an IPv6 hop by hop option which will be used
to carry node related information along a path within a network domain.
There has been previous proposals submitted
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 11:25:59 +0100, Alan Davy ad...@tssg.org wrote:
The point of our proposed solution is to specify a common set of rules
or guidelines for managing the entry of data into the hop by hop option
header data field. The hop by hop option can be ignored by routers that
do not
2009/11/12 Rémi Denis-Courmont r...@remlab.net:
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 11:25:59 +0100, Alan Davy ad...@tssg.org wrote:
The point of our proposed solution is to specify a common set of rules
or guidelines for managing the entry of data into the hop by hop option
header data field. The hop by hop
Hi Brian,
Brian E Carpenter wrote:
I may have not quite understood the comments about ECMP
and the flow label in 6man today. But here goes:
The flow label spec in RFC3697 says, very carefully and
precisely:
IPv6 nodes MUST NOT assume any mathematical or other properties of
the Flow
