Hi Simha,
Thanks for your comments, and see below:
-Original Message-
From: Narasimhan Venkataramaiah [mailto:nar...@microsoft.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 2:49 PM
To: Templin, Fred L; ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: RE: New draft on Stub Router Advertisements in IPv6
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Handling of overlapping IPv6 fragments '
draft-ietf-6man-overlap-fragment-03.txt as a Proposed Standard
This document is the product of the IPv6 Maintenance Working Group.
The IESG contact persons are Jari Arkko and Ralph Droms.
A URL of
Bob and Thomas,
Have my responses wrt your comments cleared up the concerns
to the point that this document can be considered as a 6man
working group item to update RFC4861?
Thanks - Fred
fred.l.temp...@boeing.com
-Original Message-
From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org
Fred,
Have my responses wrt your comments cleared up the concerns
to the point that this document can be considered as a 6man
working group item to update RFC4861?
No, we would have to see more support from the working group before it could be
considered a working group document. You could
Hi Fred,
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:47:04 -0800
Templin, Fred L fred.l.temp...@boeing.com wrote:
Hi Bob,
-Original Message-
From: Bob Hinden [mailto:bob.hin...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 2:52 PM
To: Thomas Narten
Cc: Bob Hinden; Templin, Fred L; ipv6@ietf.org
Mark,
Thanks for the comments, and see below:
-Original Message-
From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mark
Smith
Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 2:31 PM
To: Templin, Fred L
Cc: Thomas Narten; ipv6@ietf.org; Bob Hinden
Subject: Re: New draft on
Bob,
-Original Message-
From: Bob Hinden [mailto:bob.hin...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 12:15 PM
To: Templin, Fred L
Cc: Bob Hinden; Thomas Narten; ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: New draft on Stub Router Advertisements in IPv6
NeighborDiscovery
Fred,
Have my
The lawful intercept question is an interesting one, but
as you say if the ISP owns both the L2 and L3 infrastucture
there should be a way to support it. It may be much more
challenging to do the intercept from L2 switches located
close to the CPEs, however, since you may need many points
of
Hi Brian,
On Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:52:30 +1300
Brian E Carpenter brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com wrote:
The lawful intercept question is an interesting one, but
as you say if the ISP owns both the L2 and L3 infrastucture
there should be a way to support it. It may be much more
challenging to
