Re: [BEHAVE] address-format: bits 64 to 71

2009-12-21 Thread GangChen
2009/12/21 Christian Huitema huit...@microsoft.com If WKP(64:FF9B::/96) is the consensus, it better to state clearly that WKP should not apply U/G requirements in the draft, right? The U/G bits in 64:FF9B::/96 are set to zero, so there is no need for an exception. This is not an

Request To Advance: draft-ietf-6man-text-addr-representation-03.txt

2009-12-21 Thread Bob Hinden
Jari Ralph, On behalf of the 6MAN WG, the chairs request the advancement of: Title : A Recommendation for IPv6 Address Text Representation Author(s) : S. Kawamura, M. Kawashima Filename: draft-ietf-6man-text-addr-representation-03.txt