Hi Brian:
RPL made a pass to clean up the interface with the HbH spec whereby:
- RPL defines the bits and bytes that need to be transported, and when
the information needs to be transported in a packet
- HbH (this spec) defines how the RPL packet information is placed in
and obtained from the pac
> I agree with the prior comment that the document should explicitly
> state that it obsoletes RFC 3627 and updates RFC 4291.
you missed the discussion about that?
randy
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Adminis
On 19/11/2010 06:23 p.m., Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> Well, one point is that there is surely no rush to publish your
> draft, given the current level of usage of the flow label,
> so we can take the time to ensure that the normative references
> are correct in the end.
Agreed. - My thought was th
I agree with the prior comment that the document should explicitly state
that it obsoletes RFC 3627 and updates RFC 4291. Otherwise, I support
advancing the doc.
On 11/18/2010 7:34 PM, Bob Hinden wrote:
All,
This message starts a 6MAN Working Group Last Call on advancing:
Title
Ship it. Long overdue, and good enough.
Regards
Brian Carpenter
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
---
Fernando,
Well, one point is that there is surely no rush to publish your
draft, given the current level of usage of the flow label,
so we can take the time to ensure that the normative references
are correct in the end.
I have a list of things to do on the way to 3967bis, of which
the first one
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, Bob Hinden wrote:
as a Proposed Standard. Substantive comments and statements of
support for advancing this document should be directed to the
mailing list. Editorial suggestions can be sent to the authors.
This last call will end on December 6, 2010.
I think the docume
as a confessed co-author, i susppor this document advancing. i mention
this because there are documents which i have co-authoeed which i did
not support.
randy
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Re
Hi, Shane,
Thanks so much for your feedback! -- Please find my comments inline...
>> Ok. Here's the text that I've included right bellow the formular:
>>
>> cut here This scheme should be used when a new flow is to
>> be created (e.g., when a new TCP connection is to be created). Once
