Re: draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-rev...@tools.ietf.org

2011-05-11 Thread Ray Hunter
Arifumi Matsumoto wrote: I do not see exactly what your problem is. Ah. Maybe the light bulb has gone on at my end about a possible disconnect in requirements after having read RFC 5220 and RFC 5221 and the discussion thread from 2005 here

Re: Short 6MAN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-6man-node-req-bis-09.txt

2011-05-11 Thread Thomas Narten
Ole Troan otr...@employees.org writes: That is, a CPE router with multiple LAN interfaces is not allowed to advertise itself as a default router (when it loses internet connectivity), when that is arguably a fine thing for it to do. I have to wonder whether RFC 6204 has gotten this

Re: Short 6MAN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-6man-node-req-bis-09.txt

2011-05-11 Thread Mark Smith
Hi Thomas, On Wed, 11 May 2011 17:12:55 -0400 Thomas Narten nar...@us.ibm.com wrote: Ole Troan otr...@employees.org writes: That is, a CPE router with multiple LAN interfaces is not allowed to advertise itself as a default router (when it loses internet connectivity), when that is