Hi, Arturo,
Thanks so much for your feedback! -- Please find my responses inline...
On 06/05/2011 07:28 PM, Arturo Servin wrote:
> I think you missed the reference to RFC 6105, this is the same problem
> with the reference
> than http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-gont-v6ops-ra-guard-evasion-00.txt
On 06/05/2011 12:10 AM, John Leslie wrote:
>> I think we'd like to respond to them that that's great,
>> and we'll be interested in their results, but can they
>> *please* come back to us before saying something should
>> be changed so's we can talk about it.
>
>I don't think that's quite rig
