On 01/31/2012 10:50 PM, Fernando Gont wrote:
>OS | Atomic fragments | Improved Processing
> ---+--+--
> FreeBSD 8.2| No | No
> FreeBSD 9.0| Yes| No
>
Folks,
Since there has been a bit of guesswork regarding what systems support
(or do not support) IPv6 atomic fragments, I've played a bit with a few
operating systems, and here are the results regarding the support of
accepting incoming atomic fragments. The column entitled "Improved
Processing"
On 01/31/2012 08:12 AM, Philip Homburg wrote:
> "Such traffic absolutely occurs in the wild. I have three reasonably
> busy name servers where this is logged as an error from the ipfw code,
> e.g."
>
> Inconclusive. We don't know why that traffic is there.
>
> So, just remove that requirement fro
In your letter dated Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:42:27 -0300 you wrote:
>On 01/30/2012 06:28 PM, Philip Homburg wrote:
>> In your letter dated Sat, 28 Jan 2012 20:41:18 -0300 you wrote:
>>> That said, nobody is *introducing* atomic fragments.They should have
>>> been supported for more than 15 years, and t
