Re: 6MAN WG [second] Last Call: draft-ietf-6man-uri-zoneid-01.txt

2012-07-18 Thread t . petch
- Original Message - From: Brian E Carpenter brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com To: Bob Hinden bob.hin...@gmail.com Cc: 6man-cha...@tools.ietf.org; draft-ietf-6man-uri-zon...@tools.ietf.org; ipv6@ietf.org; Dave Thaler dtha...@microsoft.com Sent: Friday, July 06, 2012 5:56 PM Subject: Re: 6MAN WG

Re: Status of draft-ietf-6man-lineid

2012-07-18 Thread t . petch
Angels on the head of a pin. I think that almost all the world is unaware of the different classifications and so the answer for them is moot. Yes, I know, a few official bodies do care but for Internet at large, it will make no difference. That said, I care and think that PS is alway

Re: draft-chen-v6ops-nat64-experience-02

2012-07-18 Thread GangChen
cc v6ops where there is discussion on draft-chen-v6ops-nat64-experience 2012/7/6, Aleksi Suhonen aleksi.suho...@tut.fi: Hi, We've been running a NAT64/DNS64 setup at TREX Tampere Region Exchange for over a year now and I'd like to submit the following experience for your draft: Your inputs

Re: draft-chen-v6ops-nat64-experience-02

2012-07-18 Thread Michael Richardson
Aleksi == Aleksi Suhonen aleksi.suho...@tut.fi writes: Aleksi Sorry for late response. It's the summer holiday season Aleksi here. O:-) Aleksi On 07/06/2012 05:59 PM, Michael Richardson wrote: Aleksi == Aleksi Suhonenaleksi.suho...@tut.fi writes: Aleksi Within an hour,

re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-addr-select-opt-04.txt

2012-07-18 Thread Ray Hunter
I have read this draft. As previously stated, I like the idea. comments questions: Section 2: / a client MAY NOT automatically add rows to the policy table/ MAY NOT seems to contradict Section 4 /This option's concept is to serve as a hint for a node about how to behave in the network./

oversized-header-chains: Receipt of illegal first-fragments

2012-07-18 Thread Fernando Gont
Folks, There's one issue that came up during my recent exchange with Suresh on which I'd like others (including Suresh) to weigh in: Since first-fragments that fail to include the entire header chain will be illegal, I think it would be appropriate to include an additional requirement in

Re: oversized-header-chains: Receipt of illegal first-fragments

2012-07-18 Thread Vishwas Manral
Hi Fernando, I think this is an essential message that needs to be added as part of the draft. Thanks, Vishwas On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Fernando Gont fg...@si6networks.comwrote: Folks, There's one issue that came up during my recent exchange with Suresh on which I'd like others

Re: oversized-header-chains: Receipt of illegal first-fragments

2012-07-18 Thread Fred Baker (fred)
On Jul 18, 2012, at 1:36 PM, Fernando Gont wrote: Folks, There's one issue that came up during my recent exchange with Suresh on which I'd like others (including Suresh) to weigh in: Since first-fragments that fail to include the entire header chain will be illegal, I think it would be

Re: oversized-header-chains: Receipt of illegal first-fragments

2012-07-18 Thread Fernando Gont
Hi, Fred, Thanks so much for your prompt response. Please find my comments in-line... On 07/18/2012 10:03 PM, Fred Baker (fred) wrote: A host that receives a first-fragment that fails to include the entire IPv6 header chain MUST silently drop the aforementioned fragment. Clearly, since

Re: draft-ietf-6man-uri-zoneid-02.txt

2012-07-18 Thread Stuart Cheshire
On 16 Jul, 2012, at 20:50, Mark Andrews wrote: Stuart, your mail client botched the Content-type line generation. You may want to report it. Content-type: image/png; x-unix-mode=0644; name=Whatis#39; ?.png= Content-transfer-encoding: base64 Content-disposition:

Re: draft-ietf-6man-uri-zoneid-02.txt

2012-07-18 Thread Mark Andrews
In message d41807cf-b7f5-4770-8fb5-f0630aa4f...@apple.com, Stuart Cheshire wr ites: On 16 Jul, 2012, at 20:50, Mark Andrews wrote: Stuart, your mail client botched the Content-type line generation. You may want to report it. Content-type: image/png; x-unix-mode=0644;