Support.
Bob Hinden wrote:
All,
This message starts a two week 6MAN Working Group on advancing:
Title : Security Implications of the Use of IPv6 Extension
Headers with IPv6 Neighbor Discovery
Author(s) : Fernando Gont
Filename: draft-ietf-6man-n
I have read this draft and do not support it as-is.
I do not agree with the conclusion that extending RA with a new option
for SIP is necessary nor desirable.
IMVHO:
1. There are other mechanisms available. DHCPv6 is not mandatory in the
IPv6 node requirements, but neither is SIP. Adding a n
> While we do this, can I check your view on the possible document status?
> - If we need RFC2119 keywords to make the guidelines normative, would we
> make the document BCP - or are you happy with standards keywords in an
> informational document?
Actually, I was thinking Proposed Standard, as an
