On Sun, 2012-10-21 at 17:54 -0700, Mark Smith wrote:
> > network. Mitigation would need filters everywhere, just in case.
> True, however you also have the same sort of vulnerability issues to rogue
> DHCP servers.
Unicast queries go only to the correct servers. Rogues don't get a look
in - except
Hi Karl,
- Original Message -
> From: Karl Auer
> To: ipv6@ietf.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Monday, 22 October 2012 10:52 AM
> Subject: Re: Announcing Prefix Delegation extensions to ND
> draft-kaiser-nd-pd-00.txt
>
> On Sun, 2012-10-21 at 14:45 -0700, Mark Smith wrote:
>> Actually it can, as
- Original Message -
> From: "sth...@nethelp.no"
> To: alexandru.petre...@gmail.com
> Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
> Sent: Sunday, 21 October 2012 3:36 AM
> Subject: Re: Announcing Prefix Delegation extensions to ND
> draft-kaiser-nd-pd-00.txt
>
>> There is also the question of availability of
Hi Karl,
- Original Message -
> From: Karl Auer
> To: IETF IPv6
> Cc:
> Sent: Thursday, 18 October 2012 11:30 PM
> Subject: Win7 - no managed flag, DHCP address released?!?
>
> My apologies if this is not the right list for this comment/question;
> suggestions for alternatives are wel
On Sun, 2012-10-21 at 14:45 -0700, Mark Smith wrote:
> Actually it can, as the destination address for the server the relay uses
> can be the all-dhcp-serviers site-local (FF05:0:0:0:0:0:1:3) multicast
> address.
I have yet to see this in the wild, and would be interested to hear if
anyone actuall
- Original Message -
> From: Alexandru Petrescu
> To: sth...@nethelp.no
> Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
> Sent: Sunday, 21 October 2012 4:56 AM
> Subject: Re: Announcing Prefix Delegation extensions to ND
> draft-kaiser-nd-pd-00.txt
>
> Le 20/10/2012 18:36, sth...@nethelp.no a écrit :
>>> There
Hi,
While I appreciate the enthusiasm for the idea of stateless neighbor
discovery, none of these changes (versions 02 through 04) have gone
through me. I also assume that it is up to me as to whether Oliver becomes
co-author or not, as versions 00 and 01 were my individual work.
I'd appreciate
Dear Alex,
Would you explain why the vehicle would need to get a new prefix (and
thus I assume configure all the nodes in the vehicle) every time it
enters a new area ?
Thierry
On 20/10/12 20:10, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
Le 20/10/2012 18:42, Mikael Abrahamsson a écrit :
On Sat, 20 Oct 2
