On 07/04/2013 01:11 PM, Francis Dupont wrote:
In your previous mail you wrote:
Considering the above, I guess I'm in the camp of avoid fragmentation
where possible. However, I don't think I'd go as far as deprecating it.
= I have private notes about the deprecation of reassembly so
not
On 06/30/2013 10:42 PM, C. M. Heard wrote:
Fernando So far (and without having read Ron's recent I-D -- shame on me), it
Fernando looks like the main two reasons for deprecating the fragmentation
Fernando function are:
Fernando
Fernando 1) The inability of middle-boxes to parse past the
-Original Message-
From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Fernando Gont
If you're going to deprecate something on the assumption that some
implementation does something stupid about it, then I wonder what we'd
be left with. -- for instance, you
In message 51d6df54.9030...@si6networks.com, Fernando Gont writes:
On 06/30/2013 10:42 PM, C. M. Heard wrote:
Fernando So far (and without having read Ron's recent I-D -- shame on me),
it
Fernando looks like the main two reasons for deprecating the fragmentation
Fernando function are:
