RE: Last Call: (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard

2013-10-04 Thread Templin, Fred L
Hi, I have a concern about this document. In the definition of "IPv6 Header Chain", it says: "However, if a second IPv6 header appears in the header chain, as is the case when IPv6 is tunneled over IPv6, the second IPv6 header is considered to be an upper-layer header and terminates the

Re: Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-6man-ext-transmit-04: (with COMMENT)

2013-10-04 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Hi Barry, On 05/10/2013 07:29, Barry Leiba wrote: ... > -- Section 4 -- > >Additionally, IANA is requested to make the existing empty IPv6 Next >Header Types registry redirect users to a new IPv6 Extension Header >Types registry. It will contain only those protocol numbers which >

Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-6man-ext-transmit-04: (with COMMENT)

2013-10-04 Thread Barry Leiba
Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-6man-ext-transmit-04: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to

Fw: New Version Notification for draft-elkins-ippm-pdm-metrics-00.txt

2013-10-04 Thread Nalini Elkins
We have submitted a number of drafts.  Some are new and some are updates to our existing PDM proposal.  We would appreciate any comments, questions, and corrections from the lists. The new ones are: 1.  In IPPM: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-elkins-ippm-pdm-metrics-00.txt This