RE: WG Review: IPv6 Maintenance (6man)

Hi, Dear all > -Original Message- > From: Brian E Carpenter ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] > On Behalf Of > I think there's a missing goal, something like > > - Define relationship and boundary between DHCPv6-based and > RA/ND-based host configuration mechanisms. (

Updated Optimized IPv6-ND (aka WIND)

Hi Lorenzo and David, Thanks for taking time to discuss draft-chakrabarti-nordmark-6man-efficient-nd with us. We have incorporated your comments in the version 03: 1) Clarify problem statement and clarify the basic part of the optimization 2) Clarify that the registration support

RE: draft-chakrabarti-nordmark-6man-efficient-nd - Proposing new use case "Set-and-forget off-line network"

Hi Anders, Thanks for your detail comments -- those are quite useful! Please see in-line. -Original Message- From: Anders Brandt [mailto:anders_bra...@sigmadesigns.com] Sent: Monday, September 02, 2013 2:44 AM To: ipv6@ietf.org; Pascal Thubert (pthubert); Samita Chakrabarti; Erik Nordma

Re: WG Review: IPv6 Maintenance (6man)

On 12/10/2013 05:38, The IESG wrote: > Mar 2014 - Develop approach for IPv6 Fragmentation Possibly ambitious, but it is the logical next step beyond draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain. > Mar 2014 - Develop approaches for IPv6 Extension Headers (Hop-by-Hop > and Destination) Shouldn't th

RE: draft-chakrabarti-nordmark-6man-efficient-nd review

Suresh and Andrew: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-chakrabarti-nordmark-6man-efficient-nd-03.txt puts reference to the resilient RS draft and says that the number of maximum RS algorithm may be applicable in some scenarios. Thanks for your valuable comments. -Samita -Original

FW: New Version Notification for draft-chakrabarti-nordmark-6man-efficient-nd-03.txt

An updated version(03) of Optimized IPv6 ND (WIND) has been published. This version has addressed most of the comments we discussed and agreed on the changes for the update. Thanks to Jouni Korhonen, Andrew Yourtchenke, Lorenzo Colitti, David Miles, Anders Brandt for your thorough comments. Pl

Re: Last Call: (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard

> Templin, Fred L > 14 October 2013 19:39 > Hi Ron, > >> -Original Message- >> From: Ronald Bonica [mailto:rbon...@juniper.net] >> Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2013 7:07 PM >> To: Brian E Carpenter; Templin, Fred L >> Cc: Fernando Gont; 6man Mailing List; i

RE: Last Call: (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard

Hi Brian, > -Original Message- > From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, October 14, 2013 12:34 PM > To: Templin, Fred L > Cc: Fernando Gont; Ray Hunter; 6man Mailing List; i...@ietf.org > Subject: Re: Last Call: > (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Heade

Re: Last Call: (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard

Fred, On 15/10/2013 06:38, Templin, Fred L wrote: ... >> We could have that discussion in 6man, sure, but I don't believe that >> it's >> relevant to the question of whether draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header- >> chain >> is ready. > > If it messes up tunnels, then it's not ready. That doesn't fol

RE: Last Call: (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard

Hi Ron, > -Original Message- > From: Ronald Bonica [mailto:rbon...@juniper.net] > Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2013 7:07 PM > To: Brian E Carpenter; Templin, Fred L > Cc: Fernando Gont; 6man Mailing List; i...@ietf.org; Ray Hunter > Subject: RE: Last Call: > (Implications of Oversized IPv6

RE: Last Call: (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard

Hi Brian, > -Original Message- > From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, October 11, 2013 3:42 PM > To: Templin, Fred L > Cc: Fernando Gont; Ray Hunter; 6man Mailing List; i...@ietf.org > Subject: Re: Last Call: > (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header