[cross-posting 6man / 6lo]
Samita Chakrabarti et al,
Great draft which addresses important issues for low-power wireless network
technologies.
After reading the draft, it seems to me that you would benefit adding one more
use case -
and addressing the derived requirement(s).
Proposed use
/rfcdiff?url2=draft-brandt-6man-lowpanz-02
Abstract:
This document describes the frame format for transmission of IPv6
packets and a method of forming IPv6 link-local addresses and
statelessly autoconfigured IPv6 addresses on ITU-T G.9959 networks.
Cheers,
Anders Brandt
.
Thanks,
Anders Brandt
-Original Message-
From: Anders Brandt
Sent: 19. juni 2013 08:45
To: 6low...@ietf.org
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-brandt-6man-lowpanz-02.txt
A new version of I-D, draft-brandt-6man-lowpanz-02.txt has been posted to
the IETF repository
/rfcdiff?url2=draft-brandt-6man-lowpanz-01
Abstract:
This document describes the frame format for transmission of IPv6
packets and a method of forming IPv6 link-local addresses and
statelessly autoconfigured IPv6 addresses on ITU-T G.9959 networks.
Cheers,
Anders Brandt
,
Anders
-Original Message-
From: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org]
Sent: 8. februar 2013 13:02
To: Anders Brandt
Cc: Jakob Buron
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-brandt-6man-lowpanz-00.txt
A new version of I-D, draft-brandt-6man-lowpanz-00.txt has been
As a branch of the discussion [homenet] ULA scope
[draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-05.txt],
I would like some clear explanation of the actual issues related to routing
between hosts in ULA subnets.
Some people seems to be concerned for a reason that seems pretty unclear to me.
Here is my use
Brian Carpenter writes:
On 2012-03-20 21:51, Anders Brandt wrote:
Kerry Lynn writes:
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 2:22 AM, Dave Thaler dtha...@microsoft.com
wrote:
Brian Carpenter writes:
[...]
It is a surprise to me that ULA addresses are not by default routable within
the site.
I
Tim Chown wrote:
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 12:55
On 20 Mar 2012, at 21:25, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
On 2012-03-20 21:51, Anders Brandt wrote:
It is a surprise to me that ULA addresses are not by default routable
within the site.
I can easily imagine a number of LLN border routers
Kerry Lynn writes:
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 2:22 AM, Dave Thaler dtha...@microsoft.com
wrote:
Brian Carpenter writes:
[...]
Let me be clear. If a local service has (for some reason) both a ULA
and a non- ULA global address, and the host has both, I think the
correct default behaviour
