Re: getnameinfo and various protocol types

2003-12-11 Thread Andrew White
, which is also the default if none is specified? I'd also propose deprecating the default, to get everyone in the habit of specifying something. -- Andrew White IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Local addresses and security? (was: SL deprecation draft)

2003-11-23 Thread Andrew White
that does you (I declare that this 60% of this sandbox is now MINE.), but the approximately unique property is primarily designed to make it much eaiser to merge local networks. So you only need to be piecewise unique with people with whom you might want to create a local VPN. -- Andrew White

Re: Local addresses and security? (was: SL deprecation draft)

2003-11-20 Thread Andrew White
) by putting a stateful firewall in place with a very simple rule - if I didn't send something out, don't let anything back. If you really want isolation, add a proxy of your choice. And if your firewall isn't passing traffic, it doesn't matter what address range is on the inside. -- Andrew White

Re: comments on draft-hain-templin-ipv6-localcomm-03.txt

2003-11-12 Thread Andrew White
-local. -- Andrew White IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6

Re: Unicast and multicast site-local addresses

2003-10-16 Thread Andrew White
addressing draft both propose mechanism to cause the addresses generated to be unique, even outside their scope. LL uses the MAC address, while local addressing uses either allocation or randomization. -- Andrew White IETF IPv6

Re: why market picked up NATs

2003-09-24 Thread Andrew White
routing, but that's different from hierarchical delegation. These issues are very soluble, but it's a matter of how the market wishes to deploy the solutions. -- Andrew White IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED