Suresh,
Thanks. That's exactly what's happening.
Changming
-Original Message-
From: Suresh Satapati
To: Dave Thaler
Cc: Changming Liu; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2004-03-03 ¿AEA 11:43
Subject: RE: v6 host load balancing
Dave,
Lemme give this a try..
> > No matter
>Yes I'm aware of both modes. Since you mentioned the server told the
>client
>what server to use, I assumed you were talking about passive mode, which
>is what I was responding to above.
Sorry about not making it clear at the first place. Now we are on the same
page. One minor point: the pass
Hi Dave,
>If the server is telling the client who to use, then the client is
>connecting out for both the data and the control channels. If they
>go out different exit points on the client side, there's no problem
>since both connections are initiated from the inside, right?
>Can you elaborate m
otocol designers.
Thanks of taking this into consideration. We just need to make a more
thoughtful decision.
Changming
-Original Message-----
From: Bob Hinden
To: Changming Liu
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 3/3/2004 5:48 PM
Subject: RE: v6 host load balancing
Changming,
>As we talked this mo
ither forward or backward directions.
The problem we have with the draft is the "MUST NOT" sent to the same
router statement. At very minimum, it should be "SHOULD" to just leave
an option for the host to turn it off if it deems necessary.
Thanks for the chat on this topic this morn
