Support!
This document addresses an important issue in introducing IPv6 dual stack into
broadband access networks. N:1 VLAN as per TR-101 is a common deployment
model...
Dave
On 11/3/2011 11:32 AM, Bob Hinden wrote:
All,
This message starts a two week 6MAN Working Group Last Call on
A quick comment on the soapbox statement...
soapbox statement: I'm biased against this subnet model (N:1)... recreating
PPP functionality over Ethernet, trying to create user isolation on a shared
IPv6 link, which after all IPv6 protocols are not designed for.
I appreciate the IETF has been
HI
There are a couple of scenarios to consider..
1) Simple bridging from the home, hence a number of NIC address will appear at
the edge router...
2) Retail model for RGs, which is how I bought mine... My modem came from my
DSL provider, but as it had no wireless, so I turned off all higher
Narten [mailto:nar...@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 12:00 AM
To: David Allan I
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Liaison from BBF
Sorry, I still don't get it. We need more detail!
Two things stand out:
If two devices happen to have the same Ethernet MAC address as a
consequence
FYI
D
-Original Message-
From: Hemant Singh (shemant) [mailto:shem...@cisco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 9:03 AM
To: David Allan I; Manfredi, Albert E; Mikael Abrahamsson
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org; IPv6 Operations
Subject: RE: Liaison from BBF
-Original Message-
From: ipv6-boun
For those Microsoft challenged... my apologies in advance
D
Attached are a series of charts that outlines a problem the Broadband Forum is
wrestling with in the IPv6 space, the charts are in effect a companion to a
liaison sent to INTAREA. I understand agendas are full so there will not be
