RE: Updates to Node Requirements-bis (UNCLASSIFIED)

2008-02-25 Thread Duncan, Richard J CTR DISA JITC
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE John- Is there also anyway the new node requirements RFC could be somewhat reconciled with the new US Government IPv6 Profile and the DoD IPv6 Profile? It would probably keep the confusion down a bit. 01010011 01100101 01101101 0111 01100101

RE: Updates to Node Requirements-bis (UNCLASSIFIED)

2008-02-25 Thread Duncan, Richard J CTR DISA JITC
Information Systems Office: 703-814-8384 Cell: 520-226-1789 __ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 12:07 PM To: Duncan, Richard J CTR DISA JITC; ipv6@ietf.org Subject: RE: Updates

RE: ipv6 requirements for a sensor/constrained device (UNCLASSIFIED)

2008-01-18 Thread Duncan, Richard J CTR DISA JITC
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE Arul- See my previous comments. The DoD have already defined those requirements. In fact, JITC has certified a few tape libraries already. See here: http://jitc.fhu.disa.mil/apl/ipv6.html 01010011 01100101 01101101 0111 01100101 01110010

RE: ipv6 requirements for a sensor/constrained device (UNCLASSIFIED)

2008-01-18 Thread Duncan, Richard J CTR DISA JITC
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE Julien- If you are looking to sell to the DoD, follow the DoD IPv6 Standards Profiles for IPv6 Capable Products. Your product would fall into the Network Appliance category. It is based off of RFC 4294 and tightly coupled with the US Government