Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE John-
I can give you the 2 documents: DoD IPv6 Standards Profile, Version 2: http://jitc.fhu.disa.mil/apl/ipv6/pdf/disr_ipv6_product_profile_v2.pdf US Government IPv6 Profile Version 1, Draft 2: http://www.antd.nist.gov/usgv6/usgv6-v1-draft2.pdf I would suggest you look at it in the context of the RFC. The reason is because these two are different as well. 01010011 01100101 01101101 01110000 01100101 01110010 01000110 01101001 Jeremy Duncan Joint Interoperability Test Command IPv6 Test and Evaluation ManTech Telecommunications & Information Systems Office: 703-814-8384 Cell: 520-226-1789 __________________________________________________ -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 12:07 PM To: Duncan, Richard J CTR DISA JITC; ipv6@ietf.org Subject: RE: Updates to Node Requirements-bis (UNCLASSIFIED) Jeremy, >Is there also anyway the new node requirements RFC could be somewhat >reconciled with the new US Government IPv6 Profile and the DoD IPv6 >Profile? >It would probably keep the confusion down a bit. Would you be able to provide a summary of the differences? Also, are the US Government & the DoD IPv6 profiles publically available? What we could potentially do is look at resolving any major conflicts, if possible - or at least have an informative appendix covering this. Thoughts? John Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
