-Original Message-
From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Christian Huitema
Subject: RE: I-D Action:draft-krishnan-6man-header-reserved-bits-00.txt
But then, waiting for the traffic to increase and the load
balancing needs to materialize also makes a
-Original Message-
From: Suresh Krishnan [mailto:suresh.krish...@ericsson.com]
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 1:57 PM
Subject: Re: I-D Action:draft-krishnan-6man-header-reserved-bits-00.txt
I strongly support the load-balancing use of the flow label. The
question is how many bits
support
Thanks,
Wes George
-Original Message-
From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Brian Haberman
Sent: Saturday, October 09, 2010 12:39 PM
To: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Call for Adoption:draft-kohno-ipv6-prefixlen-p2p-03.txt
All,
I am
-Original Message-
From: Tina TSOU [mailto:t...@huawei.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 4:42 AM
To: George, Wes E IV [NTK]
Cc: Aleksi Suhonen; ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Flow Label: 12 bits mutable and 8 bits immutable
So you mean either we solve the issue of checksum, or we rather
-Original Message-
From: Mark Smith [mailto:i...@69706e6720323030352d30312d31340a.nosense.org]
Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2010 3:28 AM
To: George, Wes E IV [NTK]
Cc: Brian E Carpenter; 6man
Subject: Re: [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-carpenter-6man-flow-update-03.txt]
Sorry for the (very) late
.
Thanks
Wes George
-Original Message-
From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of George,
Wes E IV [NTK]
Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 5:03 PM
To: Brian E Carpenter; 6man
Subject: RE: [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-carpenter-6man-flow-update-03.txt]
-Original Message
-Original Message-
From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian E
Carpenter
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 9:11 PM
To: 6man
Subject: [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-carpenter-6man-flow-update-03.txt]
Secondly, it offers the WG a binary choice as the main decision:
