On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:33:12PM +, Templin, Fred L wrote:
> Hi Fernando,
>
> > Considering the above, I guess I'm in the camp of "avoid fragmentation
> > where possible". However, I don't think I'd go as far as deprecating
> > it.
>
> I was originally thinking this way too, but now I am th
Hello!
What is the proposed action if the hardware address of an interface is
changed regarding link-local addresses while the interface is up? I see
a few possibilities here but have not yet found an answer in the rfcs:
a) generate a new link-local interface address in addition to the old one
b)
On 11/14/2012 09:50 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>> Do we know of any use cases for IPV6_USE_MIN_MTU on TCP sockets?
>
> I think the use case is when there is a user option to use 1280 bytes
> because of a path MTU limitation due to a tunnel, *and* PMTUD and/or
> fragmentation fails. (Read draft-
On 11/13/2012 12:27 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> In message <50a111fb.2060...@bfk.de>, Hannes Frederic Sowa writes:
>> On 11/07/2012 02:30 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>>> Should setting IPV6_USE_MIN_MTU to one (1) result in fragmented TCP packets?
>>> Should setting IPV
On 11/13/2012 02:34 AM, Fernando Gont wrote:
> * If IPV6_USE_MIN_MTU means "use an MTU of 1280 bytes" (as opposed to
> "use an MTU of *at most* 1280 bytes) then IPV6_USE_MIN_MTU might still
> result in fragmentation. If, OTOH, IPV6_USE_MIN_MTU means "use an MTU of
> at most 1280 bytes", then fragme
On 11/13/2012 12:27 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> In message <50a111fb.2060...@bfk.de>, Hannes Frederic Sowa writes:
>> On 11/07/2012 02:30 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>>> Should setting IPV6_USE_MIN_MTU to one (1) result in fragmented TCP packets?
>>> Should setting IPV
On 11/12/2012 04:12 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> On 11/07/2012 02:30 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>> Should setting IPV6_USE_MIN_MTU to one (1) result in fragmented TCP packets?
>> Should setting IPV6_DONTFRAG to one (1) work on TCP sockets?
>
> As I have not read ot
On 11/07/2012 02:30 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> Should setting IPV6_USE_MIN_MTU to one (1) result in fragmented TCP packets?
> Should setting IPV6_DONTFRAG to one (1) work on TCP sockets?
As I have not read otherwise I would treat IPV6_USE_MIN_MTU as
transport-agnostic.
The usage of IPV6_DONTFRAG i
