On Sunday 21 October 2012 14:06:32 Mark Smith wrote:
Hi,
While I appreciate the enthusiasm for the idea of stateless neighbor
discovery, none of these changes (versions 02 through 04) have gone
through me. I also assume that it is up to me as to whether Oliver becomes
co-author
a few nits.
Comment and feedback most appreciated.
Kind Regards,
Oliver
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
On Thursday 18 October 2012 23:30:48 Karl Auer wrote:
My apologies if this is not the right list for this comment/question;
suggestions for alternatives are welcome.
I'd recommend the ipv6-ops mailing list on cluenet.de and possibly NANOG
Regards,
Oliver
next? Social Security numbers?
Reductio ad absurdum.
Regards,
Oliver
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
that a solicited host will most likely
attempt discovery of the algorithmically calculated source address - however,
I would argue that the cost of this extra noise is outweighed by the benefit of
ensuring non-spurious advertisements.
Kind Regards,
Oliver
On Monday 15 October 2012 13:31:10 Mark Smith wrote:
Hi Oliver,
Thanks very much for your feedback.
I think there is value in that (I think generalising is a good idea if you
can do it), however I would be interested in some use cases where something
other than the source address prefix
