Re: draft-ietf-6man-rpl-option questions

2011-11-10 Thread Reddy, Joseph
Hi Jonathan Thanks for the clarifiction. In your proposed new text, you state ...Routers MUST use IPv6-in-IPv6 tunneling, as specified in [RFC2473] to include a new RPL Option in datagrams that are sourced by other nodes... Actually, isnt it true that this action ( use of tunnelling to

RE: draft-ietf-6man-rpl-option questions

2011-11-10 Thread Reddy, Joseph
Yes, thanks ! -Original Message- From: Jonathan Hui [mailto:jon...@cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 10:58 AM To: Reddy, Joseph Cc: ipv6@ietf.org Subject: Re: draft-ietf-6man-rpl-option questions Hi Joseph, It is not actually required to use tunneling if the RPL router

Re: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-rpl-option-04.txt

2011-10-14 Thread Reddy, Joseph
Hi Jonathan, The draft uses the term RPL domain in several places and this is not clearly defined. I would imagine that it includes all nodes that are downstream of the RPL border router. But can you clarify if Host nodes that are downstream of the border router but do not implement any

RE: Comment on rpl-routing-header draft

2011-04-26 Thread Reddy, Joseph
-6man-rpl-headers-00 but I realize now this draft expired recently. Perhaps this can be revived as it is helps to improve the applicability of RPL protocol. -Joseph -Original Message- From: Thomas Narten [mailto:nar...@us.ibm.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 5:57 AM To: Reddy, Joseph

RE: Comment on rpl-routing-header draft

2011-04-25 Thread Reddy, Joseph
something ? -Joseph From: Jonathan Hui [mailto:jon...@cisco.com] Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 7:38 AM To: Reddy, Joseph Cc: 'ipv6@ietf.org' Subject: Re: Comment on rpl-routing-header draft Hi Joseph, I presume that you are not using IP-in-IP tunneling. If you were

Comment on rpl-routing-header draft

2011-04-22 Thread Reddy, Joseph
Hi, I have a comment on the rpl-routing-header draft that was noticed during interoperability testing conducted by the zigbee alliance. In the most common usage of this header, the border router inserts a source routing header with the full set of intermediate nodes before forwarding it

Comment on rpl-routing-header draft

2011-04-22 Thread Reddy, Joseph
( resending as original post didn't go through... ) Hi, I have a comment on the rpl-routing-header draft that was noticed during interoperability testing conducted by the zigbee alliance. In the most common usage of this header, the border router inserts a source routing header with the full

Comment on rpl-routing-header draft

2011-04-21 Thread Reddy, Joseph
( resending as original post didn't go through... ) Hi, I have a comment on the rpl-routing-header draft that was noticed during interoperability testing conducted by the zigbee alliance. In the most common usage of this header, the border router inserts a source routing header with the