On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, Bob Hinden wrote:
> Suresh,
>
> >coz data from the client may be going thru a different device Y, which is
> >being blocked by the fw on that device. fw Y doesn't have the hole
> >to let the traffic go through.
>
> This won't be caused by the load sharing when the data and cont
> I have a different set of experience where customers provision two or more
> parallel router+firewalls and wish to divide the traffic between them. The
> specifically do not want the other routers to be unused. They have
> installed multiple routers so if one fails they want the others (using
>
Dave,
Lemme give this a try..
> > No matter it is active or passive open, the modem stateful will need
> to
> > open
> > the "hole" by listening to the control channel for "port" and "pasv"
> > comamnd.
>
> You lost me here. Since the passive open has the connection initiated
> by the client, th
> for A records. If you only want IPv6 addresses, you may want to send
> requests for both A and addresses anyway, and convert any
> received A records into "IPv4-mapped IPv6"-addresses to be returned to
> the application.
I would say, just send request if you only want IPv6 address.
Do
