com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 11:40 PM
To: Xiayangsong
Cc: Ole Trøan; Sheng Jiang; WG; IPv6 List
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Review of draft "Prefix Assignment in DHCPv6"
But all IPv6 nodes are required to support SLAAC and all
routers are required to generate RAs. What is the
:48 AM
To: Xiayangsong
Cc: Sheng Jiang; WG; IPv6 List
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Review of draft "Prefix Assignment in DHCPv6"
Hi,
> I am a little bit confused what we are talking about.
> Our draft is necessary when there is no SLAAC.
>
> Could you elaborate your viewpoints?
th
Hi Ole
I am a little bit confused what we are talking about.
Our draft is necessary when there is no SLAAC.
Could you elaborate your viewpoints?
Thanks
Frank
-Original Message-
From: dhcwg-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:dhcwg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ole
Tr?an
Sent: Wednesday, December
Hi Ole
I read the texts you pointed to. I believe
this inconvenience needs more systematical way to fix,
which is beyond the scope of the draft.
Thanks
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Ole Trøan [mailto:otr...@employees.org]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 6:52 PM
To: Xiayangsong
Cc
Hi Ole
Thank you your review. Please see my inline response.
Thanks
Frank
-Original Message-
From: dhcwg-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:dhcwg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ole
Tr?an
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 7:21 PM
To: Sheng Jiang
Cc: WG; IPv6 List
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Review of dr
