Additional measurement information about draft-savolainen-6man-optimal-transmission-window

Hi, I just promised to send some additional information about the power consumption graphs I was just showing. The idle current draw (WiFi tethering on, phone on, cellular idle) in one of the measurement was about 138mA (in the figures I had this was the zero-line). When the cellular interface

Re: 6man IETF84 Call for agenda items

Hi, I would like to have a slot to present draft-savolainen-6man-optimal-transmission-window-00.txt (and I would hope discussion on list - and it seems the email I sent has not appeared - I'll repost). Best regards, Teemu 2012/6/20 Ole Trøan otr...@employees.org As we had in Paris, we have

New draft about synchronizing hosts' periodical communications

Greetings 6man WG, We have just published a draft about:Optimal Transmission Window Configuration Option for ICMPv6 Router Advertisement http://tools.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-savolainen-6man-optimal-transmission-window-00.txt Abstract: --- This specification describes an ICMPv6 Router

Synchronization of hosts' periodical communications

Greetings 6man WG, We have just published a draft about:Optimal Transmission Window Configuration Option for ICMPv6 Router Advertisement http://tools.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-savolainen-6man-optimal-transmission-window-00.txt Abstract: --- This specification describes an ICMPv6 Router

Re: question on RDNSS, RFC 6106 part 5.1

Hi, So how do we proceed from here? Would it be enough to discuss and agree an errata for the RFC? Doing full RFC6106bis might be overkill. Chairs? Best regards, Teemu 2012/4/27 Pavel Simerda pav...@pavlix.net Hello, my proposition is the same as Teemu's or very similar. 1) I propose

Re: question on RDNSS, RFC 6106 part 5.1

Hi, We have seen this same problem as well. Does anyone have any idea why the lifetime is bound with SHOULD to this very short time period? For example, if the Lifetime == MaxRtrAdvInterval, a host often would effectively be forced to send RS to refresh the RDNSS information before RDNSS

Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses

Hi, I prefer B for reasons of avoiding privacy issues arising from using HW-based identifiers. Best regards, Teemu 27. maaliskuuta 2012 9.33 Brian Haberman br...@innovationslab.netkirjoitti: All, The chairs would like to get a sense of the working group on changing the current (defined

RE: draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-02.txt: Rate Limiting Methods

Hi, I have a question/clarification about the Token-bucket based method I couldn't clearly figure out from draft or mail discussions I found. If there is a situation like this: - Node A is already sending loads of ICMPv6 to the Node B for any reason (Node B flooding A with echo requests for