Re: [Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gont-6man-teredo-loops-00]

2010-09-10 Thread Fernando Gont
Hi, Remi, Thanks so much for your comments! -- Please find my responses inline As far as I understand, the attack in §2.1 requires that the victim processes an IPv4 packets whereby both source and destination are equal to a local assigned address. Any sane IPv4 stack will reject such a

[Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gont-6man-teredo-loops-00]

2010-09-08 Thread Fernando Gont
Hi, folks, FYI. Thanks! Kind regards, Fernando Original Message Subject: New Version Notification for draft-gont-6man-teredo-loops-00 Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 00:15:31 -0700 (PDT) From: IETF I-D Submission Tool idsubmiss...@ietf.org To: ferna...@gont.com.ar A new version

Re: [Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gont-6man-teredo-loops-00]

2010-09-08 Thread Rémi Denis-Courmont
Hello, As far as I understand, the attack in §2.1 requires that the victim processes an IPv4 packets whereby both source and destination are equal to a local assigned address. Any sane IPv4 stack will reject such a packet, unless it comes from the loop back. The user (or 'root') could