On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 05:22:32PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Should we not update this before it goes final with the wording that has
> > been agreed for the M and O flags, and also to clarify the assertion below,
> > that RAs are the way to get default router and onlink prefix informa
Hi Tim,
> This reminds me, I don't think the IPv6 nodes requirements draft has yet
> gone final, since draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-08 still exists on the
> IETF I-D area.
Just updated it to clear current DISCUSSes.
> Should we not update this before it goes final with the wording that has
