Hi Fred,
Le 4 août 2010 à 10:13, Fred Baker a écrit :
intellectually, end to end signaling might make sense. If so, it belongs in
the end-to-end headers.
+1
More importantly, who's using it?
If using it end to end or end-to-network isn't being useful, either find a
use, or deprecate
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 12:23:05 +0200, Rémi Després remi.desp...@free.fr
wrote:
Hi Fred,
Le 4 août 2010 à 10:13, Fred Baker a écrit :
intellectually, end to end signaling might make sense. If so, it
belongs
in the end-to-end headers.
+1
More importantly, who's using it?
If using it end
Hi,
Remi Despres a ecrit:
If this this approach is retained, I could contribute on detailed
changes to RFC 3679, with whoever is interested.
Steven Blake wrote:
I agree with this in principle, but there are still a few issues:
- If the sending host sets FL=0, and an intermediate router
On 2010-08-05 14:34, Aleksi Suhonen wrote:
Hi,
Remi Despres a ecrit:
If this this approach is retained, I could contribute on detailed
changes to RFC 3679, with whoever is interested.
Steven Blake wrote:
I agree with this in principle, but there are still a few issues:
- If the sending
