On 8/20/10 2:21 PM, Thomas Narten wrote:
Please carefully re-read Raj's posting. MIPv6 doesn't even appear to
be the right mobility technology to recommend these days. That pretty
much says it all...
This needs a clarification. DS-MIPv6 (RFC ) is an extension of
MIPv6. Raj's email makes
Le 20/08/2010 20:47, Thomas Narten a écrit :
Sri Gundavellisgund...@cisco.com writes:
Couple of comments on Section 9.0 (Mobility):
draft-ietf-6man-node-req-bis-05
1.) When Mobile IPv6 was designed, one important feature that made
into the protocol is the support for Route Optimization
/2010 17:22, Sri Gundavelli a écrit :
Couple of comments on Section 9.0 (Mobility):
draft-ietf-6man-node-req-bis-05
1.) When Mobile IPv6 was designed, one important feature that made
into the protocol is the support for Route Optimization. The ability
for a mobile node to provide the information
Couple of comments on Section 9.0 (Mobility): draft-ietf-6man-node-req-bis-05
1.) When Mobile IPv6 was designed, one important feature that made into the
protocol is the support for Route Optimization. The ability for a mobile node
to provide the information on the direct (non-anchor or non
on the Home Agent to conceal the current
location of the MN.
On 8/20/2010 11:22 AM, Sri Gundavelli wrote:
Couple of comments on Section 9.0 (Mobility): draft-ietf-6man-node-req-bis-05
1.) When Mobile IPv6 was designed, one important feature that made into the
protocol is the support for Route
On 8/20/10 1:47 PM, Thomas Narten nar...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Sri Gundavelli sgund...@cisco.com writes:
Couple of comments on Section 9.0 (Mobility):
draft-ietf-6man-node-req-bis-05
1.) When Mobile IPv6 was designed, one important feature that made
into the protocol is the support
@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Comments on Section 9.0 (Mobility)
-draft-ietf-6man-node-req-bis-05
On 8/20/10 1:47 PM, Thomas Narten nar...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Sri Gundavelli sgund...@cisco.com writes:
Couple of comments on Section 9.0 (Mobility):
draft-ietf-6man-node-req-bis-05
1
; sgund...@cisco.com
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Comments on Section 9.0 (Mobility)
-draft-ietf-6man-node-req-bis-05
On 8/20/10 1:47 PM, Thomas Narten nar...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Sri Gundavelli sgund...@cisco.com writes:
Couple of comments on Section 9.0 (Mobility):
draft-ietf
Message-
From: basavaraj.pa...@nokia.com [mailto:basavaraj.pa...@nokia.com]
Sent: Friday, August 20, 2010 12:40 PM
To: Templin, Fred L; nar...@us.ibm.com; sgund...@cisco.com
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Comments on Section 9.0 (Mobility)
-draft-ietf-6man-node-req-bis-05
Fred
Hi Thomas,
Sri Gundavelli sgund...@cisco.com writes:
Couple of comments on Section 9.0 (Mobility):
draft-ietf-6man-node-req-bis-05
1.) When Mobile IPv6 was designed, one important feature that made
into the protocol is the support for Route Optimization. The
ability
20, 2010, at 11:47 AM, Thomas Narten wrote:
Sri Gundavelli sgund...@cisco.com writes:
Couple of comments on Section 9.0 (Mobility):
draft-ietf-6man-node-req-bis-05
1.) When Mobile IPv6 was designed, one important feature that made
into the protocol is the support for Route Optimization
Sri Gundavelli sgund...@cisco.com writes:
Hi Thomas/Ed:
(I was not really expecting Thomas to respond to this thread, I want
support from folks :), now they are gone).
1. We don't have any experience with MIPv6 RO, I agree. But, if we
don't enable this function in every IPv6 node, we
1. We don't have any experience with MIPv6 RO, I agree. But, if we
don't enable this function in every IPv6 node, we will never ever
have the opportunity to turn this feature on.
for all values of X. when we don't even have basics working and
deployed and actually used. full employment
13 matches
Mail list logo
