On 8/20/10 2:21 PM, Thomas Narten wrote:
Please carefully re-read Raj's posting. MIPv6 doesn't even appear to
be the right mobility technology to recommend these days. That pretty
much says it all...
This needs a clarification. DS-MIPv6 (RFC ) is an extension of
MIPv6. Raj's email makes i
/2010 17:22, Sri Gundavelli a écrit :
Couple of comments on Section 9.0 (Mobility):
draft-ietf-6man-node-req-bis-05
1.) When Mobile IPv6 was designed, one important feature that made
into the protocol is the support for Route Optimization. The ability
for a mobile node to provide the information on
Le 20/08/2010 20:47, Thomas Narten a écrit :
Sri Gundavelli writes:
Couple of comments on Section 9.0 (Mobility):
draft-ietf-6man-node-req-bis-05
1.) When Mobile IPv6 was designed, one important feature that made
into the protocol is the support for Route Optimization. The
ability for a
> 1. We don't have any experience with MIPv6 RO, I agree. But, if we
>don't enable this function in every IPv6 node, we will never ever
>have the opportunity to turn this feature on.
for all values of X. when we don't even have basics working and
deployed and actually used. full employme
Sri Gundavelli writes:
> Hi Thomas/Ed:
> (I was not really expecting Thomas to respond to this thread, I want
> support from folks :), now they are gone).
> 1. We don't have any experience with MIPv6 RO, I agree. But, if we
>don't enable this function in every IPv6 node, we will never ever
perience", type coloring.
Regards
Sri
On Aug 20, 2010, at 11:47 AM, Thomas Narten wrote:
> Sri Gundavelli writes:
>
>> Couple of comments on Section 9.0 (Mobility):
>> draft-ietf-6man-node-req-bis-05
>
>> 1.) When Mobile IPv6 was designed, one impo
Hi Thomas,
> Sri Gundavelli writes:
>
> > Couple of comments on Section 9.0 (Mobility):
> > draft-ietf-6man-node-req-bis-05
>
> > 1.) When Mobile IPv6 was designed, one important feature that made
> > into the protocol is the support for Route Opt
> -Original Message-
> From: basavaraj.pa...@nokia.com [mailto:basavaraj.pa...@nokia.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 20, 2010 12:40 PM
> To: Templin, Fred L; nar...@us.ibm.com; sgund...@cisco.com
> Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Comments on Section 9.0 (Mobility)
> -draft-ietf
>> Sent: Friday, August 20, 2010 12:03 PM
>> To: nar...@us.ibm.com; sgund...@cisco.com
>> Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: Comments on Section 9.0 (Mobility)
>> -draft-ietf-6man-node-req-bis-05
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 8/20/10 1:47
y, August 20, 2010 12:24 PM
> To: basavaraj.pa...@nokia.com; nar...@us.ibm.com; sgund...@cisco.com
> Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: Comments on Section 9.0
> (Mobility)-draft-ietf-6man-node-req-bis-05
>
> Did someone say Route Optimization? Here is a new routing,
> addressi
@cisco.com
> Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Comments on Section 9.0 (Mobility)
> -draft-ietf-6man-node-req-bis-05
>
>
>
>
>
> On 8/20/10 1:47 PM, "Thomas Narten" wrote:
>
> > Sri Gundavelli writes:
> >
> >> Couple of comments
On 8/20/10 1:47 PM, "Thomas Narten" wrote:
> Sri Gundavelli writes:
>
>> Couple of comments on Section 9.0 (Mobility):
>> draft-ietf-6man-node-req-bis-05
>
>> 1.) When Mobile IPv6 was designed, one important feature that made
>> into the pro
Sri Gundavelli writes:
> Couple of comments on Section 9.0 (Mobility):
> draft-ietf-6man-node-req-bis-05
> 1.) When Mobile IPv6 was designed, one important feature that made
> into the protocol is the support for Route Optimization. The
> ability for a mobile node to provide
MN and rely on the Home Agent to conceal the current
location of the MN."
On 8/20/2010 11:22 AM, Sri Gundavelli wrote:
Couple of comments on Section 9.0 (Mobility): draft-ietf-6man-node-req-bis-05
1.) When Mobile IPv6 was designed, one important feature that made into the
protocol is t
Couple of comments on Section 9.0 (Mobility): draft-ietf-6man-node-req-bis-05
1.) When Mobile IPv6 was designed, one important feature that made into the
protocol is the support for Route Optimization. The ability for a mobile node
to provide the information on the direct (non-anchor or non
15 matches
Mail list logo
