Re: Consensus call on adopting: draft-hartmann-6man-addressnaming

2011-06-24 Thread Brian Haberman
All, Sorry for the delay in posting this, but there is no consensus to adopt this draft as a 6MAN document. Regards, Brian On 5/18/11 1:44 PM, Brian Haberman wrote: > All, > This starts a 2-week consensus call on adopting: > > Title : Naming IPv6 address parts > Author(s)

Re: Consensus call on adopting: draft-hartmann-6man-addressnaming

2011-05-22 Thread Yu Hua bing
I do not support this draft too. -- From: "Christian Huitema" Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2011 12:03 PM To: "Brian Haberman" ; "IPv6 WG Mailing List" Subject: RE: Consensus call on adopting: draft-hartmann-6man-addressn

RE: Consensus call on adopting: draft-hartmann-6man-addressnaming

2011-05-21 Thread Christian Huitema
> This starts a 2-week consensus call on adopting ... > draft-hartmann-6man-addresspartnaming-01.txt > as a 6MAN WG document. Please state your opinion (either for or > against) on making this draft a WG draft either on the mailing list or to the > chairs. This call will end on May 1, 2011. I

Re: Consensus call on adopting: draft-hartmann-6man-addressnaming

2011-05-20 Thread Randy Bush
>> This starts a 2-week consensus call on adopting: >> Title : Naming IPv6 address parts >> Author(s) : L. Donnerhacke, et al. >> Filename : draft-hartmann-6man-addresspartnaming-01.txt to be my usual tactful self, i find this an embarrassment. it ranks right up there with

Re: Consensus call on adopting: draft-hartmann-6man-addressnaming

2011-05-18 Thread Scott Schmit
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 01:44:34PM -0400, Brian Haberman wrote ipv6: > All, > This starts a 2-week consensus call on adopting: > > Title : Naming IPv6 address parts > Author(s) : L. Donnerhacke, et al. > Filename : draft-hartmann-6man-addresspartnaming-01.txt > Pages

Re: Consensus call on adopting: draft-hartmann-6man-addressnaming

2011-05-18 Thread Brian E Carpenter
This draft claims to solve a problem that I don't have. BTW, we already have a name, in the normative ABNF in RFC 3986: h16 = 1*4HEXDIG ; 16 bits of address represented in hexadecimal (In the faulty ABNF of RFC 3261, it was called a hex4.) Regards Brian Carpen

RE: Consensus call on adopting: draft-hartmann-6man-addressnaming

2011-05-18 Thread George, Wes E [NTK]
l Message- From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian Haberman Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2011 1:45 PM To: IPv6 WG Mailing List Subject: Consensus call on adopting: draft-hartmann-6man-addressnaming All, This starts a 2-week consensus call on adopting:

Consensus call on adopting: draft-hartmann-6man-addressnaming

2011-05-18 Thread Brian Haberman
All, This starts a 2-week consensus call on adopting: Title : Naming IPv6 address parts Author(s) : L. Donnerhacke, et al. Filename : draft-hartmann-6man-addresspartnaming-01.txt Pages : 8 Date : 2011-05-06 as a 6MAN WG document. Please state your opin