On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 04:18:48PM +0100, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> Obviously multicasts are useful so I'm not saying we can't have any. But in
I just want to say that what I'm actually hearing in this is that
you'll waffle on the performance criteria you invented so long as it
means you get
On 24 okt 2008, at 18:38, David W. Hankins wrote:
What if DHCPv6 servers do not exist? AFAIK, in this thread, the cost
of unnecessary multicast DHCPv6 messages which may be prevented
through M&O bits are being discussed.
That's a separate issue. Iljitsch is proposing that Multicasts must
be
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 11:23:55AM +0900, hyunwook cha wrote:
> What if DHCPv6 servers do not exist? AFAIK, in this thread, the cost
> of unnecessary multicast DHCPv6 messages which may be prevented
> through M&O bits are being discussed.
That's a separate issue. Iljitsch is proposing that Multic
Hello, David.
A few comments are inserted.
2008/10/23 David W. Hankins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Just a few things that I think are potential factual errors or
> misreads that need clarifying.
>
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 09:48:42AM +0200, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
>> It's not a question of "problem
Replying to your change of subject, not (necessarily) the message
itself:
At the last IETF meeting, I captured a bunch of wireless traffic
during the plenary with the idea to analyze the broadcasts to see how
much airtime they take up. Unfortunately, I didn't get around to it
and deleted
Just a few things that I think are potential factual errors or
misreads that need clarifying.
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 09:48:42AM +0200, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> It's not a question of "problematic yes/no". More multicasts means less
> performance for other stuff. Obviously ARP and ND already
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:48:42 +0200
Iljitsch van Beijnum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 13 okt 2008, at 22:59, Thomas Narten wrote:
>
> > So, clients will retransmit about once every 2 minutes.
>
> But they'll transmit packets more frequently initially.
>
> >> This is unnecessary multicast traf
Iljitsch van Beijnum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 13 okt 2008, at 22:59, Thomas Narten wrote:
> > So, clients will retransmit about once every 2 minutes.
> But they'll transmit packets more frequently initially.
Sure.
> It's not a question of "problematic yes/no". More multicasts means
>
On 13 okt 2008, at 22:59, Thomas Narten wrote:
So, clients will retransmit about once every 2 minutes.
But they'll transmit packets more frequently initially.
This is unnecessary multicast traffic that could easily affect wifi
performance because on 802.11 multicasts are generally sent at th
Iljitsch van Beijnum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 13 okt 2008, at 18:19, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> > I don't have any use for DHCPv6. I need a way to shut up DHCPv6
> > clients that may end up visiting my network. Running DHCPv6 in a
> > network that doesn't support is is especially h
10 matches
Mail list logo