--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: quinta-feira, 15 de Dezembro de 2005 19:20
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: RE: Fragmented IPv6 packets
The mandate is on the fragmentation is on the transmitting side (the one that
applies the frag
: RE: Fragmented IPv6 packets
The mandate is on the fragmentation is on the transmitting side (the one that
applies the fragmentation). The receiving side may reassemble these packets.
From at least one implementation (Open BSD) there is no such check.
Also the TAHI test doesn't test for this
d the common sense says that the receiver should assemble
these packets.
Hope this helps!
Shuki
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 1:42 AM
To: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Fragmented IPv6 packets
I h
] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 12:12 PM
To: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Fragmented IPv6 packets
I have a question on IPv6 fragments. Since IPv6 mandates a minimum MTU
of 1280, IPv6 fragments (except the last fragment) should be of minimum
1280 bytes right? When an end
I have a question on IPv6 fragments. Since IPv6 mandates a minimum MTU
of 1280, IPv6 fragments (except the last fragment) should be of minimum
1280 bytes right? When an end host receives an IPv6 fragment which is
lesser than 1280 bytes ( except the last fragment ) , should it treat it
as invalid
