In your letter dated Wed, 20 Jul 2011 10:17:51 -0700 you wrote:
>> A few remarks about this draft:
>> 1) It must be somewhere in RFC-4861, but it is not easy to find and it's
>> probably best to help implementors here: if a NCE for a router transitio
>ns
>> to UNREACHABLE state and there ar
On 7/20/11 9:17 AM, Philip Homburg wrote:
In your letter dated Thu, 07 Jul 2011 13:41:41 -0700 you wrote:
A new version of I-D, draft-nordmark-6man-impatient-nud-01.txt has been
successfully submitted by Erik Nordmark and posted to the IETF repository.
Thanks for your review.
A few remarks a
In your letter dated Thu, 07 Jul 2011 13:41:41 -0700 you wrote:
>A new version of I-D, draft-nordmark-6man-impatient-nud-01.txt has been
>successfully submitted by Erik Nordmark and posted to the IETF repository.
A few remarks about this draft:
1) It must be somewhere in RFC-4861, but it is not e
This has some more details based on the mailing list discussion, and
references draft-gashinsky-v6nd-enhance-00 for further motivation.
Erik
Original Message
Subject: New Version Notification for
draft-nordmark-6man-impatient-nud-01.txt
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 13:33:06 -
