The other draft on this topic is at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/idtracker/draft-fairhurst-6man-tsvwg-udptt/
I'd love to receive feedback on this initial draft (if you have sent
previous comments please resend - because I saw none). It would be nice
to get a new revision out before the next
On Jun 4, 2009, at 9:03 AM, Gorry Fairhurst wrote:
The other draft on this topic is at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/idtracker/draft-fairhurst-6man-tsvwg-udptt/
It actually doesn't seem to be there now - but it is here
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
I too would welcome further comments on either [ ... ] draft.
In both documents: I find the arguments against UDP-Lite with a
checksum coverage of 8 to be unconvincing.
Mike Heard
