On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Marshall Eubanks wrote: > I too would welcome further comments on either [ ... ] draft.
In both documents: I find the arguments against UDP-Lite with a checksum coverage of 8 to be unconvincing. Mike Heard -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
