> On 14 Jul 2004 15:48:08 -0700,
> Tim Hartrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> I slightly recall discussions on the idea of the random identifier,
>> but I don't even remember if it was rejected. Could someone show us a
>> pointer? If it was not actually rejected, one possibility in
>> rf
Jinmei, Dan,
On Wed, 2004-07-14 at 09:08, JINMEI Tatuya / çæéå wrote:
>
> I slightly recall discussions on the idea of the random identifier,
> but I don't even remember if it was rejected. Could someone show us a
> pointer? If it was not actually rejected, one possibility in
> rfc2462bis wou
EricLKlein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 14 July, 2004 7:20 PM
Subject: Re: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2462bis-02.txt
> >>>>> On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 16:20:21 +0300,
> >>>>> "EricLKlein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 16:20:21 +0300,
> "EricLKlein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> In reviewing this document one question comes to mind from my own personal
> experience with IPv4 network and it is related to "zero touch provisioning".
> I realize that this is for stateless provisioning, b
> On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 16:36:32 -0400 (EDT),
> Dan Lanciani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
(snip)
> I believe it is a mistake for DAD to depend so strongly on the low-level
> characteristics of the network interface, especially when those characteristics
> vary so much from interface to interf
JINMEI Tatuya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|Reminder: the following wg last call will end tomorrow (July 13th).
|So far, I've only seen one comment in response to the last call (the
|one from itojun about "disabling interface" on DAD failure).
|
|I'm afraid wg members are too busy for processing a r
D]@C#:H" <"B
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 12 July, 2004 3:36 PM
Subject: Reminder: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2462bis-02.txt
> Reminder: the following wg last call will end tomorrow (July 13th).
> So far, I've only seen one comment in response to the last call
Reminder: the following wg last call will end tomorrow (July 13th).
So far, I've only seen one comment in response to the last call (the
one from itojun about "disabling interface" on DAD failure).
I'm afraid wg members are too busy for processing a rush of new I-Ds
or for writing/updating their o
All,
This note starts a 2 week IPv6 Working Group Last Call on:
Title : IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration
Author(s) : S. Thomson, et al.
Filename: draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2462bis-02.txt
Pages : 30
Date: 200
