E Carpenter
Sent: 16 November, 2008 21:07
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Loughney John (Nokia-D/MtView); 'Brian Haberman'; ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Node Requirement: New issue 5: Support for RFC 5006
Has anyone reported implementation experience with 5006?
If so, we could discuss reclassifying
Haberman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 November, 2008 18:06
To: Loughney John (Nokia-D/MtView)
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Node Requirement: New issue 5: Support for RFC 5006
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recieved a question:
What about RFC5006 Router Advertisement Option for DNS
Configuration
Requirement: New issue 5: Support for RFC 5006
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recieved a question:
What about RFC5006 Router Advertisement Option for DNS
Configuration,
or is it problem that it is of experimental category?
My feeling is that this is experimental, so it cannot really
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recieved a question:
What about RFC5006 Router Advertisement Option for DNS Configuration,
or is it problem that it is of experimental category?
My feeling is that this is experimental, so it cannot really be a
requirement.
What does the working group think?
I agree with you and with James, so I will reject this issue - no
changes needed.
John
-Original Message-
From: ext Brian Haberman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 November, 2008 18:06
To: Loughney John (Nokia-D/MtView)
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Node Requirement: New issue 5
I recieved a question:
What about RFC5006 Router Advertisement Option for DNS Configuration,
or is it problem that it is of experimental category?
My feeling is that this is experimental, so it cannot really be a
requirement.
What does the working group think?
